Romantic Consumption

And We’re Back!

My two months soldiering in the retail trenches have officially come to a close. It was a lovely and informative time; many old friends were rediscovered, new ones made, and enticing books purchased.

And now I’m right back on deadline — so full posts will have to wait until after the long Thanksgiving weekend. Oh, Thanksgiving, my favorite American holiday, where everyone gets together to celebrate the good things in their lives and eat all the beige and orange foods. (Stuffing! Turkey! Gravy on everything!)

Happy Turkey Day to everyone!

Post to Twitter

A Love Letter to Pesto

Dear pesto,

It wasn’t love at first sight. In fact, I thought you smelled precisely like vomit. “Eat it,” said my hardworking mother, cooking dinner after a twelve-hour hospital shift. “You’ll like it.”

This seemed improbable. But I was hungry and knew this was all I would be getting.

That first bite: revelation.

You shared many more nights with me after that first one — the awkward middle school years with that lapse-in-judgement perm, the high-stress high school years where getting up at five and going to bed at eleven seemed perfectly normal. But it wasn’t until college and beyond, when I was finally cooking full-time to feed myself, that I really came to appreciate your irresistible attraction and congenial simplicity.

Oh pesto, you got me through some dark, lonely nights. Your comforting carbs meant I could make a huge batch and parcel you out slowly over several nights. Your greenery and the sleekness of olive oil made me feel like I was putting good, solid things into me (rather than cheap hamburgers and spinach salads and microwave pot pies, which were my other most frequent staples). You were always warm, always willing to pair up with ravioli or tortellini or toasted French bread.

And then, when I met a marvelous man who loved to cook — oh, the stroganoff! the curry! the mashed potatoes from scratch! — you stepped aside while I nurtured this new relationship. Then, when I shyly asked you back, you came at once, sharing your bounty with both of us.

Thank you, pesto, for everything.

All my love,

Olivia

Post to Twitter

C Is For: Cocktails


It’s a cliché at this point that writers and alcohol go together. Usually the story is that inspiration is more quickly found at the bottom of a bottle—but personally, after drink number two I prefer to sing old pop songs at the top of my lungs, or go bowling with a sparkly ball far too light for me, or curl up with a blanket and movie and absolutely no pants at all.

But it’s hard not to see something literary in cocktails. You have a certain number of basic ingredients, but they can be endlessly combined with themselves or with anything else you can find to create an infinity of options. There are flavors for every palate, though no single cocktail is ever going to please every drinker. Just like with romance or fantasy or sci-fi or literary fiction: you have a set of conventions or plots or characters established by use and tradition, any number of which can be reshuffled and mixed to form endlessly new compositions.

As you can imagine, I like a good cocktail, and I like a good cocktail menu. I’ve had enough of the former so that I can often read the latter the way a well-trained musician can read a score he’s never seen before: I don’t necessarily have to taste everything on the menu all at once. (In fact, that’s not usually recommended.)

But sometimes there comes something that totally stumps me. For instance: the Smoky Godfather.

the Smoky Godfather

This was a mystery cocktail, from a restaurant called Lago in Santa Monica I had found by memory after four years’ time. The ingredients: Lagavulin 16, Theia jasmine, amaretto, and rosemary—with a lemon and a side garnish of pancetta.

In other words: a Scotch-based herbal beverage with a lemon wedge and some bacon.

You may or may not be surprised to know that it was absurdly delicious and drinkable. The Scotch burn was soothed by the herbs and the sweetness of the amaretto balanced the earthiness of the pancetta. I almost ordered a second one—but the waiter had made a bit of a fuss when I ordered the first (Waiter: “That’s a pretty big drink,” to which I mentally added the implied “little lady”).

I did decide, however, that someday I was going to write a book as strange-seeming and successful as this cocktail. I’m still working out the details,  but I have every hope that I will get there someday.

 

Post to Twitter

The Sandwich Theory Of The Romance Genre

We here at Olivia Waite have been reading Lauren Vivanco’s marvelous For Love and Money: The Literary Art of the Harlequin Mills & Boon Romance. One of the very first things it does is categorize various types of romance in light of Northrup Frye’s literary modes (high mimetic, etc.).

I won’t rehash that for you—especially since you really ought to be reading it for yourself—but it made an idea finally crystallize for me. I’ve been trying to put words around this for some time. Every time some jerk finds one terrible passage in one romance older than me, and uses it as evidence of the moral turpitude/lesser intellect/self-delusion of millions and billions of women—well, through the red mist of rage that obscures my vision and sizzles my thoughts, I have a hard time rebutting the point in ways that are clear and instantly understandable (and not loaded down with ad hominem attacks and swears).

But I think I finally have it.

A romance is like a sandwich.

That is to say, the word “sandwich” does not denote content or quality, but merely form. You put edible things between two pieces of bread—ta-da! Sandwich!

Just so, the word “romance” is not simply about the material—it’s about the shape of the story.

Image via Petit Appetit

On a sandwich, as in a romance, the beginning and the end of the form are fairly predictable (for a given value of predictable). White bread, rye, bagel, gluten-free—there’s a bit of variation, but aside from the impressive wackiness of outliers like the KFC Double Down it’s generally a bread product on the outside. (The romance version of the KFC Double Down is, obviously, this virgin-heroine-with-amnesia-meets-and-loves-seven-longhorn-shifter-brothers erotic romance by Lola Newmar. That’s a lot of, um, sandwiching.)

But the bread’s not really the important part. The bread is part of the formula. It’s the meeting on one side, the happy ending on the other.

And it’s what you put in the middle that counts.

Oh, I could write an endless paean to the middles of sandwiches. Grilled cheese! BLTs! Tuna with just the right amount of mayonnaise (and none of those noisome pickles)! Elaborate gourmet creations like foie gras sliders! The peanut butter and jelly sandwich, so pure and innocent a pleasure that it can make me tear up a little.

You can’t say “all sandwiches are terrible” or “all sandwiches are delicious.” I guarantee that if you say the latter, there will inevitably be someone in the group (or on the internet) who will take it as a dare to construct a list of sandwiches that are the furthest thing from delicious. Liverwurst and peanut butter! Roast beef and Crisco on moldy rye! Tuna cones! Which are exactly what they sound like, and aren’t technically sandwiches, but which have the distinction of being the most objectively disgusting possible food.

You can’t say “all romances are terrible” or “all romances are wonderful,” because there is always a counterexample that comes instantly to mind. It simply depends on your subjective definitions of terrible/wonderful. Now me, for instance, I could read a Regency romance once a week/have a turkey-and-swiss-on-wheat-with-mayo every day for lunch and still be pretty excited about Regency romances/turkey sandwiches.

Wait—it’s lunchtime. Why am I not doing that right now?

(Eats turkey sandwich while reading Regency romance.)

That’s better!

The other thing I like about this sandwich metaphor (which I may be taking criminally too far) is that it also functions as a perfect metaphor for a reader’s individual taste. Do you like your sandwiches hot and toasty, or cool as a cucumber? Spicy or subtle? How much cheese are you willing to tolerate—or is it a question of the more the merrier? Do you prefer your sandwiches to be made the same way every time, or are you willing to try experimental things like foie gras sliders (in this metaphor, foie gras sliders are as rich and surprising as A Lady Awakened by Cecilia Grant)

The precise form may vary slightly from culture to culture—enchiladas, samosas, pasties, dumplings, piroshky etc. … is there any culture that does not have some variation on the “put delicious things inside bread” idea?—but the appeal remains. There’s room in the sandwich world for everyone.

And if that’s not the romance industry at its best, then I don’t know what is.

Post to Twitter