Tag: the writing life

Bad Poetry Week: Call US Poet Laureate Natasha Trethewey, Tell Her Her Job Is Safe

Welcome, O Reader, to the final entry in this spontaneous Bad Poetry Week Celebration. Spurred by Amanda Palmer‘s example at the start of the week, we’ve since gawked at horrifying lizard-themed word-butchery by Troy Lumber, a cringeworthy WWI song, and and ode by the Cheese Poet.

But lest we start to feel superior, in comparison to these truly eye-bleedingly bad examples, I grit my teeth, quashed my cowardice, and brought out my own notebook of half-assed college poetry. And folks — it’s awful. The only good thing I can say about my poetical attempts is that there are mercifully few of them. And the sonnet explaining how to write a sonnet is okay.

So, in the spirit of camaraderie that is the very essence of Bad Poetry Week, I present you the reason why I should never be allowed to write free-associative verse ever again. Warning: the following poem contains levels of ham-handed allusion and overly serious pretension that, if they were turned into food, would pretty much eliminate world hunger for at least a week.

Draft #2

by Olivia Waite

The hand of the Almighty Dog

two springs connected

in oscillating ecstasy

like jellied eels in springtime

snickering apoplectically

and the ever-loving nation falls to pieces.

Where will all the insanity end?

When will the myriad voices cease

their merciless whinging clamor

a ululate gaggle of aching throats

gone hoarse screaming in lecherous agony:

“come on up to my room

and I’ll work you over.”

It’s enough to make you want

to spit on the electric fence.

And the reading accumulates

and accumulates

and accumulates and accumulates

and … well you get the idea …

and then the mind begins

its wobbly revolution:

This is the way the poem ends

this is the way the poem ends

this is the way the poem ends

  as Johnny comes marching home again

hurrah

hurrah.

 

 

Post to Twitter

Bad Poetry Week with Olivia Waite!

So last week was a rough one. I know we all were hoping this week would be better. But then news came that Amanda Palmer had written a poem about the captured Boston bomber — and not just any poem, but a really, truly, unbelievably terrible one. Vogon-worthy poetry. She’s now getting quite a bit of negative feedback for it. This is partly because there are a great many criticisms to be made about a lot of Amanda Palmer’s work, partly because there’s always a horde ready to criticize anything a woman puts into the public world, but mostly, in this specific case, because the poem is exceptionally bland and lazy. (You want to make art that humanizes mass murderers and terrorists? Wislawa Szymborska shows us how it’s done with “The Terrorist, He Watches” and the excellent “Hitler’s First Photograph.”)

What’s worse: Amanda Palmer’s terrible poem is not even terrible enough to be fun.

Over the years, I’ve become something of a connoisseur of bad poetry. The kind that will make your eyes twist and try to escape their sockets before you make them read the next line. And there’s an electricity you get from bad poetry that can be almost as refreshing as good poetry — something about bad poetry makes you realize that you’re not doing so bad in your own life after all, no matter what the nighttime voices tell you when you’re trying to sleep. So I’m declaring this week Bad Poetry Week — I’ll post a different terrible poem every day, culminating in some of my own embarrassing productions from diaries past.

Today’s terrible poem — be warned, this is not for the faint of heart.

A Tragedy

by Theophilus Marzials

Death!
Plop.

The barges down in the river flop.

Flop, plop.
Above, beneath.

From the slimy branches the grey drips drop,
As they scraggle black on the thin grey sky,
Where the black cloud rack-hackles drizzle and fly
To the oozy waters, that lounge and flop
On the black scrag piles, where the loose cords plop,
As the raw wind whines in the thin tree-top.

 

Plop, plop.
And scudding by

The boatmen call out hoy! and hey!
All is running water and sky,

And my head shrieks — “Stop,”
And my heart shrieks — “Die.”

*          *          *          *          *
My thought is running out of my head;
My love is running out of my heart,
My soul runs after, and leaves me as dead,
For my life runs after to catch them — and fled
They all are every one! — and I stand, and start,
At the water that oozes up, plop and plop,
On the barges that flop
And dizzy me dead.
I might reel and drop.
Plop.
Dead.

And the shrill wind whines in the thin tree-top
Flop, plop.
*          *          *          *          *
A curse on him.
Ugh! yet I knew — I knew –
If a woman is false can a friend be true?
It was only a lie from beginning to end –

My Devil — My “Friend”

I had trusted the whole of my living to!

Ugh; and I knew!

Ugh!
So what do I care,

And my head is empty as air –

I can do,
I can dare,
(Plop, plop
The barges flop
Drip drop.)

I can dare! I can dare!

And let myself all run away with my head
And stop.

Drop.
Dead.
Plop, flop.

                                              Plop.

{This has been your first installment of Bad Poetry Week with Olivia Waite. If you’d like to sample something in prose for a palate-cleanser, it just so happens I have a new book out, Color Me Bad, which is available from Ellora’s Cave, ARe (where it’s half off!) and the Kindle store.}

Post to Twitter

‘As if money was a substitute for fair play’: feminist subtext in The Governess Affair

After the Vicki Essex review and the feminist heroine fiasco, I’ve been feeling like many of my latest posts have come down on the negative side of the critical spectrum. To balance things out, I kept an eye out for positive examples of romances with feminist leanings — and now I’m thrilled to say that Courtney Milan’s The Governess Affair has a strongly feminist subtext based around power, money, consent, and women’s autonomy.

{Be ye warned: spoilers abound. Also, at present the novella is free on Amazon, so I’d run right out and grab it if I were you.}

Cover for Courtney Milan's The Governess Affair: a light-skinned woman with dark hair wears a long gold gown. She has her back to the viewer, and is turning to look at the viewer over her right shoulder.

The book opens with a description of two men, one of them a duke, and the other, our hero:

An untutored observer would focus on the Duke of Clermont, apparently in full command … his patrician features were sharp and aristocratic. Compared with Hugo’s own unprepossessing expression and sandy brown hair, the untutored observer would have concluded that the duke was in charge.

The untutored observer, Hugo thought, was an idiot. (2-3)

Less than a page in, the visible marks of patriarchal power—expensive clothing, “patrician features”—are irrevocably undermined. Hugo isn’t a servant. He’s a former boxer who is now something of an enforcer, working to eliminate the duke’s many debts. If he succeeds before a given date, he will be rewarded with enough money to launch his own business empire. He successfully helped the duke marry an heiress, but the new duchess’ father was canny enough to put her fortune in trust, to be doled out on a regular schedule—provided, of course, that the duke does not do anything to irritate his new bride.

Read more…

Post to Twitter

How Do You Read a Clinch Cover?

Recently the glorious Sequential Crush posted a link to Scott Edelman’s thoughtful reflection on the differences between romance comics covers and romance novel covers. He points out that he’s never noticed this variation before — that makes two of us, to my chagrin — and then he says something about clinch covers that surprised me:

They depict (or seem to anyway, since we have no idea what the characters are really thinking) people in love. And more than just in love, happy in that love. What you’re seeing is the aspirational goal of a romance—its, yes, “happily ever after” loving conclusion.

And I realized there is another disconnect here: Scott Edelman assumes that a clinch cover depicts the happily ever after.

Cover for Sandra Hill's Frankly, My Dear. A tan-skinned shirtless man with dark hair holds a tan-skinned, dark-haired woman in a yellow historical gown. Red background. The cover pose references the famous movie poster for Gone with the Wind.It has never occurred to me that clinch covers were meant to be happy. Angsty, of course — impassioned, sure. But happy? Never. For one thing, as Smart Bitches loves to point out, there is a distinct tendency for the couple to look constipated. Or sleepy. But I always interpreted the clinch as the moment where the hero and heroine have recognized that Doin’ It Is A Bad Idea, but have decided that We Just Can’t Help Ourselves. (Leaving aside questions of ravishment and forced seduction, which were definitely operating in many an Old Skool clinch cover. I’m looking at you, Kathleen Woodiwiss — though most of your clinches were stamp-sized mini-clinches glued on top of a misty landscape, for some reason.)
Clinch cover from Victoria Alexander's The Emperor's New Clothes. A pale-skinned blond man with a blue neckerchief half-wears a lighter blue button-up shirt while standing hip-deep in a pool of water. His arm is wound around the waist of a pale-skinned, red-haired woman in a damp white chemise with her hand on her hip, looking tempestuous.
This view of the clinch might explain the Mysterious Wind, which will often be tugging the hero and heroine’s flowing locks in opposite directions at the same time. They’re caught, you see, in a literal storm of passion — they lean toward each other even as the wind swirls around, about to tear them apart. The clinch is danger — the love is under threat — separation and destruction are looming.

Then again, this is all my own interpretation. I went through my collection, looking for clinch covers that showed scenes from the actual text, and came up empty-handed. (Curse my tendency to cull my shelves every other year!) The closest was the Victoria Alexander cover above, which is from a book I found recently at a library sale and haven’t had a chance to actually read yet. But judging from the title and the synopsis on the back (mistaken identities, actresses in the Wild West, and untrustworthy ladeez), I’m going to go out on a limb and say that the scene on the cover is almost certainly not the happy ever after.

I don’t have a conclusion here. I’m just kind of fascinated. Thoughts, o Reader?

 

Post to Twitter